An important issue for economics and the decision sciences is to under
stand why allocation and decision procedures are plagued by manipulati
ve and paradoxical behavior once there are n greater than or equal to
3 alternatives. Valuable insight is obtained by exploiting the relativ
e simplicity of the widely used Copeland method (CM). By using a geome
tric approach, we characterize all CM manipulation, monotonicity, cons
istency, and involvement properties while identifying all profiles whi
ch are susceptible to these difficulties. For instance, we show for n
= 3 candidates that the CM minimizes the negative aspects of the Gibba
rd-Satterthwaite theorem. (C) 1997 Academic Press.