In time-series analysis, a model is rarely pre-specified but rather is
typically formulated in an iterative, interactive way using the given
time-series data. Unfortunately the properties of the fitted model,an
d the forecasts from it, are generally calculated as if the model were
known in the first Place: This is theoretically incorrect, as least s
quares theory, for example, does not apply when the same data are used
to formulates-and fit a model. Ignoring prior model selection leads t
o biases, not only in estimates of model parameters but also in the su
bsequent construction of prediction intervals. The latter are typicall
y too narrow, partly because they do not allow for model uncertainty.
Empirical results also suggest that more complicated models tend to gi
ve a better fit but poorer ex-ante forecasts. The reasons behind these
phenomena are reviewed. When comparing different forecasting models,
the ETC is preferred to the AIC for identifying a model on the basis d
f within-sample fit, but out-of-sample forecasting accuracy provides;t
he;real test. Alternative approaches to forecasting, which avoid condi
tioning on a single model; include Bayesian model averaging and using
a forecasting method which is not model-based,but which is designed to
be adaptable and robust.