In this Commentary for the special issue of the Journal of Personality
, we discuss the uses and limitations of taxonomies in personality, dr
awing on the role of taxonomic efforts in other sciences. We endorse M
cAdams's concept of several ''levels'' (perhaps three: traits, motives
and cognitive structures, and core unity themas or identity) for orde
ring and arranging the major variables of personality. We argue that t
hese levels should be considered independent and distinct: Each level
has its own range of convenience, and no level can be reduced to any o
ther level. We suggest that the concept of conflict-within and across
levels-is a useful way to understand certain problematic cases. Finall
y, we argue that the social macrocontext (gender, class, race, culture
, and history) has unfortunately been neglected in most personality th
eories and taxonomies of variables. We illustrate the importance of so
cial macrocontext with a brief discussion of the case of Maya Angelou.