Rt. Katz et Mm. Mcculla, IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY AS A SCREENING-PROCEDURE FOR ASYMPTOMATIC DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS IN A REHABILITATION HOSPITAL, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 76(9), 1995, pp. 833-839
Objective: Patients admitted for an inpatient rehabilitation treatment
program almost uniformly have an elevated risk of deep venous thrombo
sis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), We assessed the value of impeda
nce plethysmography (IPG) as a screening procedure for asymptomatic de
ep venous thrombosis in a series of patients admitted to our instituti
on, Design: Using a prospective observational study design, consecutiv
e admissions to our facility for a period of almost one year were subj
ected to IPG within several days of admission, Setting: The study site
was a 60-bed hospital-based rehabilitation center, Patients: Four hun
dred eighty-three consecutive patients were studied prospectively with
in several days of admission, Diagnoses included a variety of neurolog
ical disorders that resulted in significant weakness, intracranial sur
gery, orthopedic surgical procedures and fractures, joint replacements
, and nonorthopedic postsurgical deconditioning. Three hundred eightee
n patients were available for three-month follow-up, Interventions: IP
G was successfully completed in 301 patients. If IPG was positive, DVT
was further assessed by duplex ultrasound (DU), When IPG and DU confi
rmed the presence of a DVT, administration of heparin and Coumadin was
begun, Main Outcome Measures: Thirteen of 416 attempted IPG studies w
ere positive for DVT, whereas DU confirmed the diagnosis in only 3 pat
ients, Results: Follow-up found that six patients developed DVT or PE
before discharge from our institution; five patients developed DVT or
PE after discharge, Conclusions: IPG has a poor yield as a screening t
ool for asymptomatic DVT on admission to an inpatient rehabilitation f
acility, The sensitivity and positive predictive value of IPG was too
low to advocate its routine use in this setting. (C) 1995 by the Ameri
can Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Ph
ysical Medicine and Rehabilitation