Background Thoracoscopic-assisted pulmonary resection for lung cancer
is controversial. The appropriateness of this approach has to be compa
red with the golden standard of an open resection. Methods. This study
consists of 66 patients with a clinical stage 1 disease. A thoracosco
pic exploration was executed in 41 patients. Only in 16 cases was a th
oracoscopic resection finally possible. The clinical and pathological
TNM classification, the histological types and the surgical procedure
are reported. The reasons for conversion are documented. Results. To i
nvestigate the appropriateness of the thoracoscopic approach we evalua
ted only the pathologically proven stage 1 disease in both groups. Pos
toperative complications, hospital stay and survival are compared. Con
clusion. Until now we can conclude that there is no adverse effect on
survival because of the thoracoscopic approach.