DOSAGE ADJUSTMENT OF HIGH-DOSE METHOTREXATE USING BAYESIAN-ESTIMATION- A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 2 DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS AT THE END OF 8-HINFUSIONS

Citation
T. Pignon et al., DOSAGE ADJUSTMENT OF HIGH-DOSE METHOTREXATE USING BAYESIAN-ESTIMATION- A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 2 DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS AT THE END OF 8-HINFUSIONS, Therapeutic drug monitoring, 17(5), 1995, pp. 471-478
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath",Toxicology,Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01634356
Volume
17
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
471 - 478
Database
ISI
SICI code
0163-4356(1995)17:5<471:DAOHMU>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Bayesian estimation (BE) of pharmacokinetic parameters enables the cli nician to adjust the dosage of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) to corre ct the inter- and intraindividual variation of concentrations that are responsible for severe toxicity. In this study of 672 HDMTX infusions , we validated an approach that consisted of reaching as nearly as pos sible a theoretical concentration of 5.10(-4) M or 10(-3) M at the end of an 8-h infusion by adjusting, when necessary, the dosage at the 6t h h. The BE of the clearance was compared with that obtained by maximu m likelihood estimation (MLE), which was used as reference. BE perform ance was evaluated by calculating the bias and precision that indicate d an overestimation of clearances obtained by BE compared with the hig her clearance of the MLE in the group of patients receiving the higher dose (15 and 37.9%). Linear regression analysis of clearance obtained by BE and MLE showed a correlation (p < 0.0001) in both groups of pat ients with a closer link in those with the lower dose. However, in cur rent clinical practice the important point is to obtain MTX concentrat ion that is as close as possible to the desired concentration. Adjustm ents were evaluated by comparing the obtained concentrations with the desired theoretical concentration. There was no bias and precision was satisfactory in both groups of patients (15 and 12%, respectively, fo r 5.10(-4) M and 10(-3) M). This method makes it possible to limit the inter- and intraindividual variations of concentrations. As a result, severe complications were essentially nonexistent and were never life threatening.