The boreal forest is in transition. Large areas in remote regions are
still in a pristine state, but extensive exploitation or intensive man
agement for wood production dominates in Russia, Canada and the Nordic
countries. The broadened view that forests are sources of other produ
cts than wood as well as of biodiversity is gradually becoming interna
tionally accepted. To sustain the boreal forest for the future it must
be realised that the forest has to be sustained as a system rather th
an as a number of utilities that can be considered separately. In nort
hern Europe the situation is particularly striking with a strong contr
ast between the adjacent boreal forests in Scotland, Sweden and Finlan
d on the one hand, and the north-west of Russia on the other. The two
regions differ by history, type of land use and economic system but th
ey are basically biologically similar. Combining sustainable wood prod
uction and maintenance of biodiversity and other values means setting
limits to the intensity and extent of forest management. If the impact
has been large, it is also necessary to build more natural features i
nto managed systems. Developing a sustained boreal forest system by ma
nagement of forests and forests reserves can be more efficient if rese
arch, education and management are well integrated. Scientists, teache
rs and managers must meet frequently and interact. In this way the tim
e-lag between the advent of new knowledge and its implementation in th
e field can be reduced. We argue that co-operation among contrasting r
egions like the east and the west provides a unique opportunity for su
ch integration, We review the problems and requirements in the west an
d the east, respectively, by contrasting Scotland, Sweden and the Komi
Republic in Russia. The experiences are different and therefore compl
ementary to each other. This assures long-term benefits of joint actio
n.