EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING FOR DIFFERENT PHENOTYPIC VARIANCES BY SIRE BREEDAND SEX ON SELECTION OF SIRES BASED ON EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES FOR 200-DAY AND 365-DAY WEIGHTS
Fa. Rodriguezalmeida et al., EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING FOR DIFFERENT PHENOTYPIC VARIANCES BY SIRE BREEDAND SEX ON SELECTION OF SIRES BASED ON EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES FOR 200-DAY AND 365-DAY WEIGHTS, Journal of animal science, 73(9), 1995, pp. 2589-2599
The effects of accounting for different phenotypic variances according
to sire breed and sex subclasses on estimation of sire breed effects
and prediction of expected progeny differences of sires mated to Heref
ord and Angus cows were investigated. Data consisted of 6,977 and 6,53
0 records of (weaning) and 365-d (yearling) weights, respectively, of
F-1 calves sired by bulls (662 and 661, respectively) of 23 breeds tha
t have been evaluated in the Germ Plasm Evaluation Program at the U.S.
Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE. Models compared include
d fixed effects of genetic group of sire (samples of sires evaluated a
t different times), dam breed, sex, birth year of calf and age of dam,
plus sire within genetic group and dam within dam breed as random eff
ects. Variance structures were different: Model I assumed homogeneous
variances across sire breed-sex subclasses; Model II accounted for dif
ferences in phenotypic variance by sire breed and sex subclasses. Diff
erences between estimates of sire group effects obtained with the two
models were not significant for either trait. Product-moment and rank
correlations between expected progeny differences obtained with Model
I and Model II were greater than .93 when computed within each group a
nd .99 or larger when computed across breeds. There were slight change
s in the numbers of sires contributed by different breeds to the propo
rtions selected across breeds under different selection intensities wh
en sires were ranked with the two models. However, differences between
means predicted under Model II were small when sires were ranked and
selected based on the two models. Changes in standard errors of predic
tion for expected progeny differences and standard errors for estimate
s of breed effects obtained when adjusting for differences of phenotyp
ic variances, compared to not adjusting, were proportional to the rati
os of the phenotypic standard deviations of the sire breeds to the com
mon phenotypic standard deviation.