In asthmatic and control subjects, we examined the changes in ventilat
ory capacity (VE(Cap)), end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and degree
of flow limitation during three types of exercise: 1) incremental, 2)
constant load (50% of maximal exercise capacity; 36 min), and 3) inter
val (alternating between 60 and 40% of maximal exercise capacity; 6-mi
n workloads for 36 min). The VE(Cap) and degree of flow limitation at
rest and during the various stages of exercise were estimated by align
ing the tidal breathing flow-volume (F-V) loops within the maximal exp
iratory F-V (MEFV) envelope using the measured EELV. In contrast to mo
re usual estimates of VE(Cap) (i.e., maximal voluntary ventilation and
forced expiratory volume in 1 s x 40), the calculated VE(Cap), depend
ed on the existing bronchomotor tone, the lung volume at which the sub
jects breathed (i.e., EELV), and the tidal volume. During interval and
constant-load exercise, asthmatic subjects experienced reduced ventil
atory reserve, higher degrees of flow limitation, and had higher EELVs
compared with nonasthmatic subjects. During interval exercise, the VE
(Cap), of the asthmatic subjects increased and decreased with variatio
ns in minute ventilation, due in part to alterations in their MEFV cur
ve as exercise intensity varied between 60 and 49% of maximal capacity
. In conclusion, asthmatic subjects have a more variable VE(Cap) and r
educed ventilatory reserve during exercise compared with nonasthmatic
subjects. The variations in VE(Cap), are due in part to a more labile
MEFV curve secondary to changes in bronchomotor tone. Asthmatics defen
d VE(Cap), and minimize flow limitation by increasing EELV.