A powerful paradigm (the pedestal-plus-test display) is combined with
several subsidiary paradigms (interocular presentation, stimulus super
positions with varying phases, and attentional manipulations) to deter
mine the functional architecture of visual motion perception: i.e. the
nature of the various mechanisms of motion perception and their relat
ions to each other. Three systems are isolated: a first-order system t
hat uses a primitive motion energy computation to extract motion from
moving luminance modulations; a second-order system that uses motion e
nergy to extract motion from moving texture-contrast modulations; and
a third-order system that tracks features. Pedestal displays exclude f
eature-tracking and thereby yield pure measures of the first- and seco
nd-order systems which are found to be exclusively monocular. Interocu
lar displays exclude the first- and second-order systems and thereby t
o yield pure measures of feature-tracking. Results: both first- and se
cond-order systems are fast (with temporal frequency cutoff at 12 Hz)
and sensitive, Feature tracking operates interocularly almost as well
as monocularly. It is slower (cutoff frequency is 3 Hz) and it require
s much more stimulus contrast than the first- and second-order systems
. Feature tracking is both bottom-up (it computes motion from luminanc
e modulation, texture-contrast modulation, depth modulation, motion mo
dulation, flicker modulation, and from other types of stimuli) and top
-down-e.g. attentional instructions can determine the direction of per
ceived motion.