Tw. Kim et Rc. Smart, LACK OF EFFECT OF RETINOIC ACID AND FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE ON MIREX TUMOR PROMOTION INDICATES A NOVEL MIREX MECHANISM, Carcinogenesis, 16(9), 1995, pp. 2199-2204
Mirex, a halogenated hydrocarbon, is a potent skin tumor promoter in 7
,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-initiated mouse skin, In the pres
ent study retinoic acid (RA) and fluocinolone acetonide (FA), classica
l inhibitors of phorbol ester- and non-phorbol ester-type skin tumor p
romoters, were examined for their ability to inhibit mirex tumor promo
tion, Female CD-1 mice were initiated with 200 nmol DMBA and promoted
with equipotent promoting doses of either 5 nmol 12-O-tetradecanoylpho
rbol-13-acetate (TPA) or 200 nmol mirex twice weekly for 25 weeks and
RA (2 or 5 nmol), FA (0.5 or 2 nmol) or acetone were applied 30 min pr
ior to each TPA or mirex dose, TPA-promoted papilloma formation was st
rongly inhibited by >70% with both doses of RA and by >90% with both d
oses of FA, In contrast, mirex-promoted papilloma formation was not in
hibited by either dose of RA or 0.5 nmol FA and 2 nmol FA weakly inhib
ited mirex-promoted papillomas by only 32%, TPA- and mirex-promoted pa
pillomas that were refractory to RA and FA demonstrated the same incid
ence of Ha ras mutation as TPA- or mirex-promoted papillomas without R
A and FA treatment, further indicating that the inhibitory activity of
RA and FA is promoter-dependent and not solely dependent on mutant Ha
-ras, FA (2 nmol) treatment completely abolished TPA-induced epidermal
hyperplasia and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) S phase-pos
itive cells, however, FA had no inhibitory effect on the weak prolifer
ative response induced by mirex, Collectively, these results indicate
that the promotional activity of mirex, as well as its weak proliferat
ive response, result from a distinct promoter mechanism and/or that mi
rex promotes a unique population of epidermal cells that are insensiti
ve to FA and RA and cannot be distinguished by their mutant Ha-ras gen
otype.