Psychocultural interpretation theory explains the intensity and intran
sigence of ethnic conflicts and in so doing challenges earlier antipsy
chological views of social and political conflict. It provides a socia
lly rooted psychoanalytic theory and language giving a central role to
culturally rooted social and psychological processes which produce di
spositions-shared images, perceptions of the external world, and motiv
es for individual and group behavior. In intransigent ethnic conflicts
, those core dispositions which invoke security fears and deep-seated
threats to identity, are used by groups and individuals to interpret t
he motives of opponents in ways which often prevent groups from addres
sing the competing substantive interests which divide them. Conflict m
anagement proposals which follow from psychocultural interpretation th
eory focus on either altering disputants' deep-seated mutual fears sur
rounding issues of identity and security in intense conflicts or in lo
wering their salience. To do this, parties must come to recognize the
connection between past losses and present fears, and to engage in col
lective grieving, mourning, and reconciliation. Psychocultural interpr
etation theory does not deny the relevance of either power inequalitie
s or interest-based proposals for peacemaking but sees critical first
steps in conflict management as changing the mutual hostile interpreta
tions antagonists hold.