Rc. Klesges et al., ARE SELF-REPORTS OF SMOKING RATE BIASED - EVIDENCE FROM THE 2ND NATIONAL-HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY, Journal of clinical epidemiology, 48(10), 1995, pp. 1225-1233
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Medicine, General & Internal
This study determined evidence for digit preference in self-reports of
smoking in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Surve
y (NHANES II). Subject were 4275 adult smokers. Self-reports of smokin
g showed a marked degree of digit preference, with the vast majority o
f smokers reporting in multiples of 10 cigarettes per day. When number
per day was compared to an objective measure of smoking exposure (car
boxyhemoglobin; n = 2070) the distribution was found to be significant
ly assymetrical. Analysis of the distribution of COHb and various leve
ls of number per day indicates that the differences in distribution ar
e not due to variability in COHb. Heavier smokers, Caucasians, and tho
se with less education were more likely to report a digit preference t
han lighter smokers, African-Americans, and those with more education.
Results suggest that self-reports of number of cigarettes per day may
be biased towards round numbers (particularly 20 cigarettes per day).
Implications for assessment of smoking behavior are discussed.