Mh. Vatn et al., ADVERSE REACTION TO FOOD - ASSESSMENT BY DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED FOOD CHALLENGE AND CLINICAL, PSYCHOSOMATIC AND IMMUNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS, Digestion, 56(5), 1995, pp. 421-428
Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with food item
s applied in capsules was performed in a prospective study of 17 selec
ted patients and 34 age- and sex-matched healthy controls in the inter
disciplinary clinical setting. Protein immunoblotting showed no differ
ences in antigenicity between foods in the capsules and the correspond
ing fresh foods. All patients reacted to one or more food substances d
uring DBPCFC, with a doubtful reaction to placebo in 2 patients. Agree
ment between diet history and provocation was seen in 53 of 85 individ
ual food challenges, 36 being positive with both examinations. In 22 (
38%) of the 58 positive provocations, the reactions were not expected
from the patients' histories. No reaction to food or placebo occurred
in the control group. Related to diet history, sensitivity and specifi
city of provocation were 62 and 63%, respectively, with a positive pre
dictive value of 78%. Allergy, previous gastroenterologic and infectio
us diseases among first-degree relatives, immunologic abnormalities an
d elevation of total IgE were significantly more common for the patien
ts than controls. A positive skin prick test correlated well with diet
history, but both prick test and food antibodies correlated poorly wi
th DBPCFC. Assessment by the General Health Questionnaire showed a sig
nificant difference towards the controls. After 3-4 months of follow-u
p on an individually based diet, 11 of 15 patients reported general im
provement of their condition. DBPCFC may be a valuable diagnostic test
in addition to dietary history as a basis for elimination diet in foo
d-intolerant patients. The effect of the elimination diet on the sympt
oms may also suggest a therapeutic effect or provocation. The interdis
ciplinary characterization of a selected group of food-intolerant pati
ents suggests a multifactorial etiopathogenesis behind this diagnosis.