DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ORALLY-ADMINISTERED ETODOLAC AND NABUMETONE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE
Tj. Schnitzer et al., DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ORALLY-ADMINISTERED ETODOLAC AND NABUMETONE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE, Clinical therapeutics, 17(4), 1995, pp. 602-612
This 4-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlle
d, parallel-group, multicenter study was designed to compare the effic
acy and safety of etodolac and nabumetone in the treatment of patients
with active osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Ninety-one patients rece
ived etodolac 400 mg twice daily, 89 received nabumetone 1500 mg once
daily, and 90 received placebo. Both active treatments significantly i
mproved the patients' condition relative to baseline (P less than or e
qual to 0.001) at all evaluations during treatment and relative to pla
cebo (P less than or equal to 0.05) by visit 4. Improvement relative t
o placebo in investigator's global assessments was earlier in the etod
olac group (ie, by visit 3) than in the nabumetone group. At visit 4,
improvement in investigator's and patient's global assessment scores,
and in the distribution of investigator's assessment scores, was signi
ficantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) greater in the etodolac group
than in the nabumetone group. Other than hypokalemia, which occurred o
nly in three patients in the nabumetone group (P = 0.035), there were
no significant differences among the groups in the frequency of study
events or premature discontinuation from the study as a result of stud
y events. Study events considered at least possibly treatment related
were reported for 26 patients in the etodolac group (28.6%), 20 in the
nabumetone group (22.5%), and 23 in the placebo group (25.6%). The mo
st frequently reported symptoms for all groups were dyspepsia, nausea,
and headache. Four patients treated with nabumetone (4.5%) had elevat
ions in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase during
treatment. The results of this study show that etodolac 400 mg twice d
aily is at least as effective as nabumetone 1500 mg once daily and is
equally well tolerated in the treatment of patients with active OA of
the knee; etodolac may have an earlier onset of action and/or a relati
vely greater efficacy in patient and investigator global assessments t
han nabumetone.