DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ORALLY-ADMINISTERED ETODOLAC AND NABUMETONE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE

Citation
Tj. Schnitzer et al., DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ORALLY-ADMINISTERED ETODOLAC AND NABUMETONE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE, Clinical therapeutics, 17(4), 1995, pp. 602-612
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
01492918
Volume
17
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
602 - 612
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(1995)17:4<602:DPCOTS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
This 4-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlle d, parallel-group, multicenter study was designed to compare the effic acy and safety of etodolac and nabumetone in the treatment of patients with active osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Ninety-one patients rece ived etodolac 400 mg twice daily, 89 received nabumetone 1500 mg once daily, and 90 received placebo. Both active treatments significantly i mproved the patients' condition relative to baseline (P less than or e qual to 0.001) at all evaluations during treatment and relative to pla cebo (P less than or equal to 0.05) by visit 4. Improvement relative t o placebo in investigator's global assessments was earlier in the etod olac group (ie, by visit 3) than in the nabumetone group. At visit 4, improvement in investigator's and patient's global assessment scores, and in the distribution of investigator's assessment scores, was signi ficantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) greater in the etodolac group than in the nabumetone group. Other than hypokalemia, which occurred o nly in three patients in the nabumetone group (P = 0.035), there were no significant differences among the groups in the frequency of study events or premature discontinuation from the study as a result of stud y events. Study events considered at least possibly treatment related were reported for 26 patients in the etodolac group (28.6%), 20 in the nabumetone group (22.5%), and 23 in the placebo group (25.6%). The mo st frequently reported symptoms for all groups were dyspepsia, nausea, and headache. Four patients treated with nabumetone (4.5%) had elevat ions in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase during treatment. The results of this study show that etodolac 400 mg twice d aily is at least as effective as nabumetone 1500 mg once daily and is equally well tolerated in the treatment of patients with active OA of the knee; etodolac may have an earlier onset of action and/or a relati vely greater efficacy in patient and investigator global assessments t han nabumetone.