R. Dore et al., EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ETODOLAC AND NAPROXEN IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE - A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY, Clinical therapeutics, 17(4), 1995, pp. 656-666
A multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, outpatient st
udy compared the efficacy and safety of etodolac versus naproxen in pa
tients with osteoarthritis of the knee. After a washout period free of
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 254 patients self-administered
etodolac 400 mg (n = 86), naproxen 500 mg (n = 82), or placebo (n = 86
) twice daily for 4 weeks. Compliance exceeded 90% in all three groups
. Primary efficacy variables improved progressively from baseline in a
ll three groups. The extent of improvement was greater in the etodolac
and naproxen groups than in the placebo group (P less than or equal t
o 0.003), except with respect to target joint tenderness (P = 0.028, e
todolac vs placebo; P = 0.013, naproxen vs placebo). Then were no stat
istical differences between active treatment groups (P > 0.1). At end
point, twice as many patients responded in the etodolac (59%) and napr
oxen groups (51%) than in the placebo group (26%; P less than or equal
to 0.01). There were no significant between-group differences in the
numbers of patients who had an adverse experience, a serious adverse e
xperience, or an adverse experience leading to study discontinuation;
there were also no significant between-group differences in the distri
bution of adverse experiences. There were no unexpected clinical or la
boratory experiences. Etodolac 400 mg twice daily was as effective and
safe as naproxen 500 mg twice daily and both were superior to placebo
in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee.