Cj. Snijders et al., WHY LEG CROSSING - THE INFLUENCE OF COMMON POSTURES ON ABDOMINAL MUSCLE-ACTIVITY, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 20(18), 1995, pp. 1989-1993
Study Design. Abdominal muscle activity is recorded in the supine posi
tion, unconstrained standing, and in the sitting position on an office
chair with the use of backrest and armrests, with and without crossed
legs. Objectives, To assess the role of oblique abdominal muscles in
relation to the stability of lumbar spine and pelvis in commonly adopt
ed unconstrained postures. Summary of Background Data. Cross-legged si
tting is very common for men and women, No solid evidence exists for e
ither a beneficial or a detrimental effect of this posture. No electro
myographic study deals with the activity of abdominal muscles in this
commonly adopted unconstrained posture. Methods. In healthy subjects,
electromyographic activity of the rectus abdomini and external and int
ernal oblique abdominals was recorded bilaterally during commonly adop
ted unconstrained postures. Results. The activity of the internal obli
que muscle was significantly higher in the sitting position than in th
e supine position. For the external and internal oblique abdominals, t
he activity was significantly higher in the standing position than in
the sitting position. When sitting, the activity of the oblique abdomi
nals is significantly lowered by crossing the legs in the preferred wa
y (either upper legs crossed or ankle on knee). In contrast, the activ
ity of the rectus abdominis is not significantly altered by leg crossi
ng. Conclusions. From these remarkable findings, we conclude that leg
crossing is physiologically valuable. It should be studied whether leg
crossing can be implemented in the design of the workplace.