F. Vlaspolder et al., DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF AN AMPLIFICATION METHOD (GEN-PROBE) COMPARED WITHTHAT OF CULTURE FOR DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 33(10), 1995, pp. 2699-2703
Five hundred fifty respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens from 340 p
atients were analyzed by comparing the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacteri
um Tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD) with conventional culture, which was
the method of reference, for the detection of the Mycobacterium tuber
culosis complex, After resolution of discrepant results by retesting t
he samples and reviewing the patients' clinical histories, a total of
60 respiratory specimens were MTD and culture positive, 347 were MTD a
nd culture negative, 4 were MTD positive and culture negative, and 1 w
as MTD negative and culture positive. This results in a sensitivity of
98.4%, a specificity of 98.9%, and positive and negative predictive v
alues of 93.8 and 99.7%, respectively, Repeatedly, clinicians asked to
test specimens of nonpulmonary origin by MTD, Although, MTD is not ap
proved for use with nonrespiratory specimens, the following results we
re shown, Sixty-one pleural exudate specimens showed disappointing res
ults (sensitivity, 20%), However, MTD performed well with another 77 n
onrespiratory specimens; 17 samples were positive and 57 samples were
negative by both MTD and culture, No false-negative results were found
by MTD, Three MTD-positive, culture-negative specimens had high sampl
e relative light unit/cutoff relative light unit ratios, strongly sugg
esting true tuberculosis, Positive microscopy and positive culture wit
h MTD-negative results occurred 12 times, Those cultures showed atypic
al mycobacteria 11 times and Actinomyces species once, The stability o
f the reagents in the MTD kit was also assessed by testing reagents, i
ncluding the enzyme mixture, kept at -70 degrees C for at least 6 mont
hs, No loss of activity was seen.