MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF A DELETED X-CHROMOSOME (XQ13.3-XQ21.31)EXHIBITING RANDOM X-INACTIVATION

Citation
Br. Migeon et al., MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF A DELETED X-CHROMOSOME (XQ13.3-XQ21.31)EXHIBITING RANDOM X-INACTIVATION, Somatic cell and molecular genetics, 21(2), 1995, pp. 113-120
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Cell Biology","Genetics & Heredity",Biology
ISSN journal
07407750
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
113 - 120
Database
ISI
SICI code
0740-7750(1995)21:2<113:MCOADX>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
As a result of selection following random X chromosome inactivation in human females, X chromosomes with visible deletions are usually inact ive in every somatic cell. We have studied a female with mental retard ation and dysmorphic features whose karyotype includes an X chromosome with a visible interstitial deletion in the proximal long arm. Based on cytogenetic analysis, the proximal breakpoint appeared to be in ban d Xq13.1, and the distal one in band q21.3. However, molecular analyse s show that less of the q13 band is missing than cytogenetic studies i ndicated, as the deletion includes only loci from the region Xq13.3 to Xq21.31. Unexpectedly, studies of chromosome replication show that th e pattern of X inactivation is random. Whereas the deleted X chromosom e is late replicating in some cells from all tissues studied, it is ea rly replicating in the majority of blood lymphocytes and skin fibrobla sts, and is the active X chromosome in many of the hybrids derived fro m skin fibroblasts. As this chromosome is able to inactivate, it must include those DNA sequences from the X-inactivation center (XIC) that are essential for cis X inactivation. Molecular studies show that the XIC region, at Xq13.2, is present, so it is unlikely that the lack of consistent inactivation of this chromosome is attributable to close pr oximity of the breakpoint to the XIC. Supporting this conclusion is th e similarity of the breakpoints to those of the other chromosomes we s tudied whose deletions clearly do not interfere with the ability to in activate. Our results show that deletions distal to DXS441 in Xq13.2 d o not interfere with cis X inactivation. We attribute the random patte rn of X inactivation reported here to the fact that in the tissues stu died cells with this interstitial deletion are not at a selective disa dvantage.