Br. Migeon et al., MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF A DELETED X-CHROMOSOME (XQ13.3-XQ21.31)EXHIBITING RANDOM X-INACTIVATION, Somatic cell and molecular genetics, 21(2), 1995, pp. 113-120
As a result of selection following random X chromosome inactivation in
human females, X chromosomes with visible deletions are usually inact
ive in every somatic cell. We have studied a female with mental retard
ation and dysmorphic features whose karyotype includes an X chromosome
with a visible interstitial deletion in the proximal long arm. Based
on cytogenetic analysis, the proximal breakpoint appeared to be in ban
d Xq13.1, and the distal one in band q21.3. However, molecular analyse
s show that less of the q13 band is missing than cytogenetic studies i
ndicated, as the deletion includes only loci from the region Xq13.3 to
Xq21.31. Unexpectedly, studies of chromosome replication show that th
e pattern of X inactivation is random. Whereas the deleted X chromosom
e is late replicating in some cells from all tissues studied, it is ea
rly replicating in the majority of blood lymphocytes and skin fibrobla
sts, and is the active X chromosome in many of the hybrids derived fro
m skin fibroblasts. As this chromosome is able to inactivate, it must
include those DNA sequences from the X-inactivation center (XIC) that
are essential for cis X inactivation. Molecular studies show that the
XIC region, at Xq13.2, is present, so it is unlikely that the lack of
consistent inactivation of this chromosome is attributable to close pr
oximity of the breakpoint to the XIC. Supporting this conclusion is th
e similarity of the breakpoints to those of the other chromosomes we s
tudied whose deletions clearly do not interfere with the ability to in
activate. Our results show that deletions distal to DXS441 in Xq13.2 d
o not interfere with cis X inactivation. We attribute the random patte
rn of X inactivation reported here to the fact that in the tissues stu
died cells with this interstitial deletion are not at a selective disa
dvantage.