MODELING ALTERNATIVE GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION METHODS IN CONTRASTING HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTINGS

Authors
Citation
Pf. Hudak et Sa. White, MODELING ALTERNATIVE GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION METHODS IN CONTRASTING HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTINGS, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A: Environmental science and engineering, 32(1), 1997, pp. 105-122
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Engineering, Environmental
ISSN journal
10934529
Volume
32
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
105 - 122
Database
ISI
SICI code
1093-4529(1997)32:1<105:MAGRMI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
A contaminant fate and transport model was used to simulate the effect s of 11 remediation schemes on benzene plumes in three hydrogeologic s ettings. Pump and treat, bioremediation, and a combination of those te chnologies were considered. Dissolved oxygen concentrations of 8 and 5 0 mg/l were used at injection wells. The simulated aquifers include sa nd and gravel, silty sand, and clayey sand. Interior injection (50 mg/ l O-2) was most successful overall, consistently attaining the highest rank in each setting. Interior extraction/exterior injection (50 mg/l O-2) ranked second overall. Whether used for injection or extraction, interior well configurations generally outperformed alternative patte rns. Interior extraction, the most successful pump and treat scheme, p erformed effectively in the sand and gravel aquifer, but was among the lowest ranking schemes in the lower velocity settings. In contrast, i nterior injection (8 mg/l O-2) performed better in the low velocity aq uifers. Consistently, downgradient extraction and no action were the l east effective schemes.