Objective: To collect and compare written procedures for central fine
intravenous site care. Design: Descriptive, stratified, random sample
survey. Setting: Adult medical-surgical critical care units among hosp
itals throughout the United States. Sample: One hundred fifty-two retu
rned surveys. Results: A 24.6% response rate with underrepresentation
from smaller institutions and hospitals in the Mid-Atlantic and West S
outh Central regions of the country, There were wide variations in pro
cedures for intravenous site care related to type of dressing used and
frequency of dressing changes. Conclusions: Standardization of cathet
er care is needed to ensure consistent quality of intravenous site car
e. Lack of standardization may be due to lack of a research data base
linking various components of care to outcomes such as infection, pati
ent comfort, or catheter retention.