REACTIONS AND RATE CONSTANTS BETWEEN HYDROXYL RADICALS AND THE DIMER AND MONOMER OF SPIN TRAP 2-METHYL-2-NITROSOPROPANE DETERMINED BY THE PULSE-RADIOLYSIS METHOD
M. Kuwabara et al., REACTIONS AND RATE CONSTANTS BETWEEN HYDROXYL RADICALS AND THE DIMER AND MONOMER OF SPIN TRAP 2-METHYL-2-NITROSOPROPANE DETERMINED BY THE PULSE-RADIOLYSIS METHOD, Journal of physical chemistry, 99(38), 1995, pp. 14078-14082
Reaction rate constants between OH radicals and the dimer and monomer
of the spin trap 2-methyl-2-nitrosopropane (MNP) were determined by th
e pulse radiolysis method. Before pulse radiolysis experiments, the mo
lar absorbance coefficients of the dimer and monomer were determined b
y a method combining NMR and optical absorbance spectrometries. First,
NMR signal intensities of the dimer and monomer were related to their
molar concentrations using deuterated tert-butyl alcohol, (CH3)(3)C-O
D, as a standard. Since the monomer was eliminated by bubbling the sol
ution with Ar gas and the remaining dimer was found to gradually decom
pose to the monomer, the changes of molar concentrations against time
starting from the dimer alone until reaching dimer-monomer equilibrium
were next measured by monitoring both NMR and optical absorbance spec
tra (at delta = 1.59 and lambda = 320 nm for the dimer and at delta =
1.28 and lambda = 662 nm for the monomer). The molar absorbance coeffi
cients were finally determined to be epsilon(320) (nm) = 410 +/- 40 M(
-1) cm(-1) for the dimer and epsilon(662) (nm) = 10 +/- 5 M(-1) Cm-1 f
or the monomer by comparing the curves measured by NMR with those meas
ured by optical absorbance spectrometry. Pulse radiolysis experiments
on the reaction rate constant between OH radicals and the dimer were c
arried out in aqueous solutions containing different amounts of the MN
P dimer alone, and it was determined to be (3.0 +/- 0.3) x 10(9) M(-1)
s(-1). Experiments on the reaction rate constant between OH radicals
and the monomer were carried out in solutions containing both the dime
r and monomer, and it was determined to be (1.3 +/- 0.9) x 10(10) M(-1
) s(-1).