DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF HUMAN TUMOR-CELLS TO POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS - STIMULATION OF PROLIFERATION OF A COLON-TUMOR CELL-LINE BY DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID
Sd. Heys et al., DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF HUMAN TUMOR-CELLS TO POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS - STIMULATION OF PROLIFERATION OF A COLON-TUMOR CELL-LINE BY DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID, International journal of oncology, 7(4), 1995, pp. 927-933
The potential differential effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids (5-1
00 mu g/ml) on four human tumour cell lines of different origin and a
human fibroblast cell line were investigated. Following 6 days exposur
e to the fatty acids, gamma linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, and
docosahexaenoic acid, culture growth was almost completely abolished
at the highest concentration used. At lower concentrations, the tumour
cell lines exhibited a differential sensitivity to the inhibitory eff
ects of the fatty acids on cell number (IC50, breast=lung>melanoma>col
on). MRC-5 fibroblast cell numbers were significantly increased at low
concentrations of gamma linolenate and eicosapentaenoate, but signifi
cantly reduced by docosahexaenoate. These effects on cell numbers were
rapid in onset. Following only 2 days exposure to low concentrations
of the fatty acids, cell numbers in the breast tumour cell line, MCF-7
, were significantly reduced relative to controls. In contrast, the co
lon cell line, WiDR, was largely unaffected at this time, and in some
cases, cell numbers were significantly increased. In the normal fibrob
last cell line, cell numbers were significantly reduced by docosahexae
noate at concentrations greater than or equal to 20 mu g/ml. Following
only 2 days exposure to PUFA, cell death in the breast cell cultures
was maximally increased above controls by 20 mu g/ml of docosahexaenoa
te, whereas cell proliferation was unaffected at this concentration. I
n contrast, under these circumstances, cell proliferation in the colon
cell cultures was significantly increased by this PUFA while there we
re only small increases in cell death. Our observations have highlight
ed the differential responses of human tumour cell lines to PUFAs and
documented the stimulation of a colon cell line by certain PUFAs.