DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF HUMAN TUMOR-CELLS TO POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS - STIMULATION OF PROLIFERATION OF A COLON-TUMOR CELL-LINE BY DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID

Citation
Sd. Heys et al., DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSES OF HUMAN TUMOR-CELLS TO POLYUNSATURATED FATTY-ACIDS - STIMULATION OF PROLIFERATION OF A COLON-TUMOR CELL-LINE BY DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID, International journal of oncology, 7(4), 1995, pp. 927-933
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
10196439
Volume
7
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
927 - 933
Database
ISI
SICI code
1019-6439(1995)7:4<927:DROHTT>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The potential differential effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids (5-1 00 mu g/ml) on four human tumour cell lines of different origin and a human fibroblast cell line were investigated. Following 6 days exposur e to the fatty acids, gamma linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid, culture growth was almost completely abolished at the highest concentration used. At lower concentrations, the tumour cell lines exhibited a differential sensitivity to the inhibitory eff ects of the fatty acids on cell number (IC50, breast=lung>melanoma>col on). MRC-5 fibroblast cell numbers were significantly increased at low concentrations of gamma linolenate and eicosapentaenoate, but signifi cantly reduced by docosahexaenoate. These effects on cell numbers were rapid in onset. Following only 2 days exposure to low concentrations of the fatty acids, cell numbers in the breast tumour cell line, MCF-7 , were significantly reduced relative to controls. In contrast, the co lon cell line, WiDR, was largely unaffected at this time, and in some cases, cell numbers were significantly increased. In the normal fibrob last cell line, cell numbers were significantly reduced by docosahexae noate at concentrations greater than or equal to 20 mu g/ml. Following only 2 days exposure to PUFA, cell death in the breast cell cultures was maximally increased above controls by 20 mu g/ml of docosahexaenoa te, whereas cell proliferation was unaffected at this concentration. I n contrast, under these circumstances, cell proliferation in the colon cell cultures was significantly increased by this PUFA while there we re only small increases in cell death. Our observations have highlight ed the differential responses of human tumour cell lines to PUFAs and documented the stimulation of a colon cell line by certain PUFAs.