In multiattribute decision problems, the subject has to evaluate a num
ber of alternatives with given values on a number of attributes, in or
der to arrive at some conclusion about the attractiveness or utility o
f these alternatives. The information processing procedure leading to
a conclusion is called a decision strategy, and one of the main resear
ch topics in multiattribute decision research has been the extent to w
hich these strategies follow compensatory principles. Judges are said
to follow compensatory strategies when low values on some attributes a
re compensated for by high values on other attributes. In process trac
ing studies using the information board technique, descriptions of dec
ision strategies are usually based on three indices of the information
search process: variability of search, search pattern (Payne, 1976),
and depth of search. Variability of search, defined as the standard de
viation of the proportion of information searched per alternative, is
considered to give an indication of the degree of compensation of a de
cision strategy, compensation being smaller as variability increases.
In this article, we propose an alternative way for establishing the de
gree of compensation of decision strategies in information board studi
es. We argue that the degree of compensation depends on both variabili
ty of search and depth of search (the proportion of information search
ed), and that a valid compensation index has to be a multiplicative fu
nction of these two indices.