J. Broadbent et al., HALOPERIDOL PREVENTS ETHANOL-STIMULATED LOCOMOTOR-ACTIVITY BUT FAILS TO BLOCK SENSITIZATION, Psychopharmacology, 120(4), 1995, pp. 475-482
The effect of the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol on the deve
lopment of sensitization to ethanol-induced increases in locomotor act
ivity was examined in DBA/2J mice. In Experiment 1, different groups o
f mice were given saline or ethanol (2 g/kg) immediately before each o
f four locomotor activity sessions (48-h intervals), and 1 h after pre
treatment with saline, 0.10 or 0.15 mg/kg haloperidol. During a subseq
uent test, mice showed locomotor sensitization despite blockade of eth
anol stimulated activity by haloperidol on the first conditioning tria
l. Moreover, test session activity was reduced in subjects that had pr
eviously received haloperidol, even though haloperidol was not present
during testing. The second experiment examined the nature of the latt
er finding by comparing subjects that received equal exposure to halop
eridol but differed in the pairing of its administration with the acti
vity chambers. After four conditioning trials, each group was tested i
n the absence of haloperidol. Mice that had previously received halope
ridol paired with the activity chambers were less active than control
groups, suggesting development of a conditioned suppression of activit
y. Overall, these results suggest a dissociation of the neurobiologica
l mechanisms that mediate the acute locomotor stimulant effects of eth
anol and those mediating sensitization. Further, these studies illustr
ate the importance of antagonist-alone control groups that assess the
possible influence of associative learning induced by the antagonist i
tself.