Jp. Heggers et al., WOUND-HEALING EFFECTS OF ALOE GEL AND OTHER TOPICAL ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS ON RAT SKIN, PTR. Phytotherapy research, 9(6), 1995, pp. 455-457
The effects of topical antibacterials were studied in an acute wound h
ealing model, Sprague-Dawley rats after appropriate anaesthesia receiv
ed four 1.5 cm(2) dorsal defects through the skin and panniculus carno
sus, Skin defects were treated for 14 days with 2% mupirocin ointment,
1% clindamycin cream, 1% silver sulfadiazine cream+Aloe vera gel, and
silver sulfadiazine combined with Aloe gel. An untreated group served
as controls, Each group was comprised of 10 animals each to achieve s
tatistical significance, Wound closure rate was assessed by serial pla
nimetry. Following healing, the breaking strength of each resultant sc
ar was determined. Wound half-lives and overall healing rates were cal
culated by regressing the log of the areas of all wounds over time, Ov
erall healing rates of all the treated groups were significantly diffe
rent compared with control group (p < 0.05). The Aloe group had the sh
ortest half-life and healed faster than the control group, All the oth
er treated groups had no longer half-lives when compared with the cont
rol group, While silver sulfadiazine+Aloe increased the breaking stren
gth of the healed wound. Aloe alone did not, but demonstrated an incre
ase over the control. Topical Aloe significantly enhances the rate of
wound healing and when combined with silver sulfadiazine reverses the
wound retardant effect observed with silver sulfadiazine. Clindamycin
and mupirocin significantly delay wound closure, However mupirocin enh
anced the breaking strength of the wound.