J. Wennerberg et al., FLOW-CYTOMETRY ANALYSIS OF MALIGNANT-TUMORS OF THE HEAD AND NECK - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN 2 METHODS IN THE RECOGNITION OF ANEUPLOIDY, Analytical cellular pathology, 12(3), 1996, pp. 125-136
DNA aneuploidy, which reflects changes in nuclear DNA-content, as dete
rmined cytometrically is a candidate prognostic factor in squamous cel
l carcinoma of the head and neck. The aim of this study was to compare
two different preparation methods with respect to their use in detect
ing aneuploid tumor cell populations in malignant tumors of the head a
nd neck. Fresh frozen tumor material was used. The methods compared we
re a multistep procedure (A) including fixation of cells and enzymatic
treatment, and a one step procedure (B). Both include RNAse and the u
se of propidium iodide for DNA staining. Forty-seven percent of the tu
mors were non-diploid according to method A, and 29% according to meth
od B, discordant findings being made in 15 tumors, only two of which w
ere non-SCC. Defining a 'true non-diploid tumor' in this series as a t
umor with a DNA index outside the range of diploidy detected either by
method A or B, 59% (29/49) of the tumors were non-diploid. The sensit
ivity was 0.48 (14/29) for method B and 0.79 (23/29) for method A. The
striking differences in accuracy between methods A and B emphasize th
e need of caution when new methods are introduced, and when results ob
tained with different methods are compared. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevie
r Science Ireland Ltd.