S. Schauder et al., OLAQUINDOX-INDUCED AIRBORNE PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS FOLLOWEDBY TRANSIENT OR PERSISTENT LIGHT REACTIONS IN 15 PIG BREEDERS, Contact dermatitis, 35(6), 1996, pp. 344-354
There have been no previous reports of photosensitivity following phot
oallergy to airborne olaquindox in a large group. 15 pig breeders, wit
h photo-distributed dermatitis related to olaquindox dust, were invest
igated to study the nature, promoting factors, and course of this dise
ase. Minimal erythema doses for WA and UVB were established before pho
topatch testing and at intervals thereafter. All patients presented wi
th olaquindox-induced photoallergy. Ln 14 cases, this was followed by
prolonged increased sensitivity to UVA. 7 patients also displayed an i
ncreased sensitivity to UVB. 13 farmers came into contact with olaquin
dox in mineral feed (1000 mg/kg) and only 2 in final feed (50 mg/kg).
8 patients avoided further contact with olaquindox because of warnings
in the media. Allergies and photoallergies to other occupational subs
tances preceded or followed olaquindox (photo)allergy. Because of thei
r increased sensitivity to light, most of these farmers used sunscreen
s, and 2 of them developed (photo)allergy to UV-absorbers. As a result
of our studies, we recommend photopatch testing for olaquindox in pig
breeders with photo-distributed dermatitis. This would enable the ear
ly recognition of photoallergy to olaquindox and the prevention of per
sistent light reaction.