Jc. Kappes et al., ASSESSMENT OF ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY BY PLASMA VIRAL LOAD TESTING - STANDARD AND ICD HIV-1 P24 ANTIGEN AND VIRAL-RNA (QC-PCR) ASSAYS COMPARED, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology, 10(2), 1995, pp. 139-149
To assess the utility of quantitative competitive-polymerase chain rea
ction (QC-PCR) measurements of plasma human immunodeficiency virus typ
e 1 (HIV-1) RNA and other viral load markers for assessment of antiret
roviral therapy, we used archived cryopreserved specimens from a rando
mized controlled clinical trial of 135 patients (CD4(+) T cell count l
ess than or equal to 500/mm(3)), comparing zidovudine (500 mg/day) ver
sus the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor L-697,661 (50, 3
00, or 1,000 mg daily). We evaluated treatment-associated changes in p
lasma viral load by standard and immune complex-dissociated (ICD) HIV-
1 p24 antigen assays, and, in a representative subset of patients (n =
46), by QC-PCR determination of virion-associated HIV-1 RNA. At basel
ine, HIV-1 RNA was quantifiable by QC-PCR in all patients tested (100%
), whereas standard and ICD HIV-1 p24 antigen tests were positive (gre
ater than or equal to 30 pg/ml) in 42% and 56%, respectively. All vira
l load parameters showed significant decreases from baseline within 1
week of initiation of zidovudine, as measured by standard p24 antigen
assay, ICD p24 assay, and QC-PCR. At 1 week, patients treated with eit
her 300 or 1,000 mg/day of L-697,661 showed significant decreases from
baseline in plasma standard and ICD p24 antigen and QC-PCR-determined
HIV-1 RNA levels. Whereas viral load decreases seen with zidovudine w
ere sustained for the duration of treatment, plasma viral markers ofte
n returned to pretreatment levels despite ongoing L-697,661 treatment,
with evidence of the emergence of drug-resistant virus. Whereas stand
ard p24, ICD p24, and viral RNA levels changed similarly in response t
o treatment, the superior sensitivity and available dynamic range of p
lasma viral RNA assays like QC-PCR analysis provide an advantage for c
linical monitoring of plasma viral load, allowing tracking of treatmen
t-related changes even in patients with earlier stage disease and lowe
r levels of viral load.