S. Schroder et al., ADRENOMEDULLARY AND ADRENOCORTICAL NEOPLA SIAS - MORPHOLOGICAL TYPING, ASSESSMENT OF BIOLOGICAL POTENTIAL, PROGNOSIS AND ETIOLOGY, Der Pathologe, 16(5), 1995, pp. 307-314
The aim of morphological tumour diagnosis is to answer clinical questi
ons on type, biological potential, prognosis and aetiology of individu
al neoplasms. The limitations and perspectives of different methods us
ed in the diagnosis of adrenal tumours, ranging from histology to mole
cular genetic DNA analyses, are described. When surgical specimens fro
m adrenal neoplasms cannot be typed on the basis of histology and/or w
ith clinica data (e. g., endocrine symptoms and history) as adrenocort
ical tumours, phaeochromocytomas or metastases to the adrenal, immunoh
istological investigations with a panel of different antibodies are ne
cessary. After identification of the tissue derivation of an individua
l adrenal tumour, its biological potential must be assessed. Among adr
enocortical neoplasms? adenomas and carcinomas can be distinguished by
evaluation of various histological parameters (including structural f
eatures and signs of invasion) according to defined algorithms. In add
ition, conventional histology (by estimation of mitotic activity) allo
ws the discrimination of tumours with especially high malignant potent
ial from other adrenocortical carcinomas. In contrast, among adrenomed
ullary tumours even the combined use of histological, immunohistologic
al and DNA cytophotometric techniques only allows the definition of ri
sk groups (benign versus suggestive of malignancy), while reliable rec
ognition of an individual malignant phaeochromocytoma is so far imposs
ible. The question as to whether a particular phaeochromocytoma repres
ents a sporadic tumour or a neoplasm inherited as one feature of a def
ined syndrome cannot be answered with the above methods, but only by t
he application of molecular genetic techniques.