M. Ovadia et al., ACCELEROMETER SYSTOLIC-TIME INTERVALS AS FAST-RESPONSE SENSORS OF UPRIGHT POSTURE IN THE YOUNG, Circulation, 92(7), 1995, pp. 1849-1859
Background Sensors of posture may improve rate-adaptive pacing in synd
romes where syncope occurs in the upright posture, particularly in the
young. No sensor of posture has been described to date. Previous stud
ies suggest that two sensors currently under investigation (preejectio
n period [PEP] and left Ventricular ejection time [LVET] systolic time
intervals [STIs] and accelerometers) may be affected by posture. A PE
P-sensing pacemaker is available commercially in which heart rate (HR)
decreases with an increase in PEP (partial derivative[HR]/partial der
ivative[PEP]<0). In patients with upright syncope, it is not known how
such algorithms respond to posture. Also, it is not known whether STI
s correlate with posture independent of autonomic tone. Methods and Re
sults We studied accelerometer-derived STIs in head-upright tilt-testi
ng with beta-blockade and catecholamine stimulation in patients with s
yncope or presyncope using an ultra-low-frequency accelerometer placed
on the chest. Thirty-two patients age 6 to 22 years with unexplained
recurrent syncope or presyncope underwent tilt-testing involving two t
o four tilts (60 degrees) at baseline, during esmolol infusion (500 mu
g/kg load, 50 to 140 mu g/kg per minute), after esmolol withdrawal, a
nd during isoproterenol infusion if not contraindicated. PEP, LVET, an
d other indexes were quantified, and their relations to posture and to
autonomic state were determined. With tilt, PEP increased from 98.9+/
-2.2 to 109.1+/-2.8 msec (P<.0001), and LVET decreased (supine-to-upri
ght) from 295.5+/-4.5 to 247.2+/-4.7 msec (P<.0001). PEP/LVET changed
from 0.337+/-0.01 to 0.45+/-0.02 (P<.0001). Similar postural changes w
ere observed during tilt with beta-blockade and esmolol withdrawal, an
d during isoproterenol infusion. STI changes occurred immediately on p
ostural change and were stable. Postural change of PEP was greater tha
n the beta-adrenergic effect by 6:1. Postural change of STIs was indep
endent of vagal tone. Conclusions First, accelerometer-derived STIs de
tect postural changes. Because these changes are independent of autono
mic tone and are rapid and stable, they may be useful as fast-response
sensors of upright posture in rate-adaptive pace makers. Second, with
postural change, HR increases when PEP increases. However, PEP-sensin
g pacemakers presently under investigation assume the opposite (invers
e) mathematical relationship. Therefore, current PEP-sensing pacemaker
s use an incorrect algorithm for physiological postural responses in s
yncope patients. These data predict a paradoxical tachycardic response
to the supine posture in patients implanted with these devices.