INTERVAL MAMMOGRAPHY AFTER NEEDLE LOCALIZATION BIOPSY OF BREAST ABNORMALITIES THAT ARE PATHOLOGICALLY BENIGN

Citation
Jl. Gwin et al., INTERVAL MAMMOGRAPHY AFTER NEEDLE LOCALIZATION BIOPSY OF BREAST ABNORMALITIES THAT ARE PATHOLOGICALLY BENIGN, The American journal of surgery, 170(4), 1995, pp. 323-326
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00029610
Volume
170
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
323 - 326
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(1995)170:4<323:IMANLB>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Needle localization biopsy is commonly performed for the d iagnosis of mammographic abnormalities, Routine specimen radiography i s generally recommended, but the value of routine short-interval postb iopsy mammography has not been analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We perf ormed a retrospective review of 299 consecutive localized biopsies in 286 women from March 1989 to November 1993. Of these biopsies, 217 for m the basis for this study; all yielded a benign pathologic diagnosis and had both specimen radiography and 3-month interval mammograms perf ormed, RESULTS: A total of 192 (88%) of postbiopsy mammograms were int erpreted as negative, while 22 (10%) were suspicious, Three patients h ad second biopsies and all had benign diagnoses, 16 had follow-up mamm ograms that were interpreted as normal or Stable, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up, A suspicious postbiopsy mammogram had no significan t relationship to initial mammographic abnormality or pathologic diagn osis, but did correlate with specimen radiograph interpretation (P = 0 .02 by chi-square comparison). CONCLUSIONS: In a series of needle loca lization biopsies with intraoperative specimen radiography, postbiopsy mammography failed to reveal any missed cancers, Short-interval follo w-up mammography is unnecessary to assess for residual abnormalities w hen specimen radiography confirms excision of the abnormality.