Dr. Thomas et al., THE RISK OF ACQUIRING Q-FEVER ON FARMS - A SEROEPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY, Occupational and environmental medicine, 52(10), 1995, pp. 644-647
Objectives-To determine the occupational risk of Q fever. Design-Cohor
t study. Setting-Community: five English local authority districts. Su
bjects and methods-Prevalence and incidence of immunoglobulin G (IgG)
specific antibody to Coxiella burnetii phase II antigen was measured i
n a representative (study) cohort of farm workers in the United Kingdo
m, and detailed exposure data were collected. Also seroprevalence of Q
fever in a (control) cohort of police and emergency service personnel
was measured. Results-Prevalence was significantly (P < 0.01) higher
in the study cohort (105/385 v 43/395). During the first 12 month peri
od after enrolment no seroconversions were found (upper 95% confidence
limit: 1318/100 000/year). During the second 12 month period after en
rolment two seroconversions were found, equalling an incidence of 813/
100 000/year (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 98-2937/100 000/year).
No association was found between seroprevalence and age. In the study
cohort, extent of total contact with farm animals seemed more importan
t than exposure to any specific animal: full time employees were more
than four times more likely to be antibody positive than part time emp
loyees (P < 0.05). Exposure to cattle, but not sheep, goats, cats, raw
milk, and hay (all reported sources of Q fever) was associated with b
eing positive to Coxiella burnetii IgG by univariate analysis but this
association was not independent of total farm animal contact. Conclus
ions-The risk of Q fever on livestock farms is related to contact with
the farm environment rather than any specific animal exposure. The ab
sence of an increasing prevalence with age suggests that exposure may
occur as clusters in space and time (outbreaks).