Jp. Richter et al., A NONINVASIVE EVALUATION OF BARORECEPTOR SENSITIVITY WITH THE VALSALVA MANEUVER AND PHENYLEPHRINE METHODS, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology, 17(6), 1995, pp. 423-428
In a double-blind crossover study, we compared baroreceptor sensitivit
y (BS) and latency, derived from the phenylephrine method with BS and
latency derived from phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver(VM) using the F
inapres(TM), a noninvasive blood pressure monitor Ten healthy voluntee
rs were enrolled in the study and BS was determined with placebo, atro
pine (0.03 mg/kg) and atenolol(10 mg) and was expressed as the linear
relation between the change in RR interval following the blood pressur
e vise induced by either phenylephrine or phase IV of the VM (i.e., af
ter cessation of straining). Baseline baroreceptor sensitivity (p < 0.
001) and baroreceptor sensitivity in the presence of atropine (p < 0.0
2) was smaller with the VM but no differences in baroreceptor sensitiv
ity between the two methods were evident after atenolol. Although no l
inearity existed between the two methods under any of the experimental
conditions, baroreceptor sensitivity in the presence of atropine was
significantly smaller (p < 0.01) (and latency delayed(p < 0.08)) compa
red to atenolol-induced changes with both methods. We found excellent
correlation between baroreceptor sensitivity derived from the ECG trac
ing and Finapres(TM) recorded beat-to-beat pulse intervals (p < 0.001;
r > 0.8, under all conditions) although the correlation after atropin
e was not as close (p < 0.01; r = 0.7). The smaller baroreceptor sensi
tivity induced by the Valsalva maneuver with placebo and atropine, but
not with atenolol, suggests a parasympathetically influenced vasodila
tion, and sympathetically mediated tachycardia during phase IV of the
VM.