Bj. Park et al., CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS AND THE RISK OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS INFECTIONIN YOUNG-WOMEN, American journal of epidemiology, 142(7), 1995, pp. 771-778
To evaluate the relation between contraceptive methods and cervical Ch
lamydia trachomatis infection, the authors studied a population-based
sample of 1,779 nonpregnant women aged 15-34 years who underwent cell
culture diagnostic testing for the detection of C. trachomatis at a he
alth maintenance organization. Barrier contraceptive method users were
classified as those who reported using one of the following methods a
t time of testing: condom, diaphragm, cervical cap, spermicidal sponge
, foam, or vaginal spermicidal suppositories. Barrier methods were ass
ociated with a reduction in the risk of chlamydial infection in women
aged 25 years or older when compared with all other women in the same
age category (adjusted prevalence odds ratio = 0.15, 95% confidence in
terval (Cl) 0.04-0.66). When compared with only noncontracepting women
, the adjusted prevalence odds ratio was 0.34 (95% Cl 0.06-1.99). The
protective effect of barrier methods was not evident in women younger
than age 25 years. Oral contraceptive use was not associated with the
risk of C. trachomatis infection using either referent group; the adju
sted prevalence odds ratio was 0.99 (95% Cl 0.57-1.73) compared with a
ll other women, and 0.88 (95% Cl 0.44-1.79) compared with noncontracep
ting women. These findings suggest that present patterns of use of bar
rier methods differ by age and afford only selective protection agains
t cervical C. trachomatis infections.