Background and Purpose The growing interest in testing new therapeutic
agents for acute brain injury has lead to increased use of stroke sca
les. The reliability and validity of these measures need to be examine
d more completely. We used structural equation modeling, a technique t
hat merges the analytic procedures of factor analysis and multiple reg
ression, to examine the reliability and construct validity of the Midd
le Cerebral Artery Neurological Scale and the Scandinavian Neurologica
l Stroke Scale used together as the Unified Neurological Stroke Scale.
We also analyzed the predictive validity, sensitivity, and specificit
y of the scales in predicting mortality and functional outcome. Method
s We prospectively studied 84 consecutive patients admitted to a neuro
logy/neurosurgery intensive care unit with intracerebral hemorrhage (n
=30), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=15), ischemic stroke (n=15), and trau
matic brain injury (n=24). Patients were evaluated within 24 hours of
admission and at 48-hour intervals until intensive care unit discharge
. A total of 386 assessments were obtained. The Functional Independenc
e Measure was administered by telephone 3 months after hospital discha
rge. Results High levels of reliability and construct validity were ob
served for the majority of the Unified Stroke Scale items. Facial pals
y and eye movement items had the lowest reliability and validity. Both
the Middle Cerebral Artery and Scandinavian Scales were significant p
redictors of outcome. Sensitivity and specificity varied by diagnosis.
Predictive validity of functional outcome was best in groups with isc
hemic and hemorrhagic stroke rather than traumatic brain injury and su
barachnoid hemorrhage. Conclusions The Unified Stroke Scale demonstrat
es reliability and construct and predictive validity, and its use is s
upported in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Structural equation model
ing is an appropriate technique for use with scales of this type.