THE RATIO OF H-2 COLUMN DENSITY TO (CO)-C-12 INTENSITY IN THE VICINITY OF THE GALACTIC-CENTER

Citation
Tj. Sodroski et al., THE RATIO OF H-2 COLUMN DENSITY TO (CO)-C-12 INTENSITY IN THE VICINITY OF THE GALACTIC-CENTER, The Astrophysical journal, 452(1), 1995, pp. 262-268
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Journal title
ISSN journal
0004637X
Volume
452
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Part
1
Pages
262 - 268
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-637X(1995)452:1<262:TROHCD>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Observations from the COBE(7) Diffuse Infrared Background Experiment ( DIRBE) at wavelengths of 140 and 240 mu m are combined with the Goddar d-Columbia (CO)-C-12 (J = 1 --> 0) surveys to derive an estimate for X , the ratio of H-2 column density to (CO)-C-12 intensity, within appro ximately 400 pc of the Galactic center. The H-2 column density is infe rred from the infrared observations by assuming a proportionality betw een dust-to-gas mass ratio and gas metallicity. It is found that the v alue of X in the Galactic center region is a factor of 3-10 lower than the corresponding ratio for molecular cloud complexes in the inner Ga lactic disk. Therefore, the use of the inner disk value of X to derive the mass of molecular hydrogen in the vicinity of the Galactic center and the 300 MeV-5 GeV gamma ray flux from that region will result in overestimates of both quantities. We attribute the so-called gamma-ray deficit from the Galactic center region to the erroneous use of a con stant value of X throughout the Galaxy. Combining our results with sev eral virial analyses of giant molecular cloud complexes in the Galacti c disk, we find that the value of X increases by more than an order of magnitude from the Galactic center to a Galactocentric distance of 13 kpc. This implies that studies of the large-scale (CO)-C-12 emission from our own Galaxy and external spiral galaxies, in which a constant ratio of H-2 column density to (CO)-C-12 intensity was adopted, have s ignificantly overestimated the relative amount of molecular hydrogen a t small Galactocentric distances and significantly underestimated the relative amount of molecular hydrogen at large Galactocentric distance s.