QBC(R) AND GIEMSA-STAINED THICK BLOOD FILMS - DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS

Citation
Te. Clendennen et al., QBC(R) AND GIEMSA-STAINED THICK BLOOD FILMS - DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 89(2), 1995, pp. 183-184
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Tropical Medicine
ISSN journal
00359203
Volume
89
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
183 - 184
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-9203(1995)89:2<183:QAGTBF>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
This study compared the proficiency of military medical technicians in the diagnosis of malaria using Giemsa-stained thick blood films (GSF) and the QBC(R) system. Fourteen technicians, with no previous experie nce of the QBC(R) and limited experience in interpreting GSF, were giv en training in the 2 techniques and then tested on their ability to ma ke a malaria diagnosis when provided with previously prepared GSF and QBC(R) specimens (9 positive and 10 negative). The students achieved a sensitivity of 75% and 84%, respectively, with the QBC(R) and GSF; sp ecificity was 84% and 76%. There was no difference in the concordance of the 2 techniques with the actual diagnosis (80% vs. 81%).