Tl. Chen et al., COMPARISON OF FLOW AND IMAGE CYTOMETRY FOR DNA CONTENT-ANALYSIS OF FRESH AND FORMALIN-FIXED, PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUE IN BREAST-CARCINOMA, Cytometry, 22(3), 1995, pp. 181-189
DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction are considered to be prognostic variab
les in breast carcinoma, DNA content of 35 cases of breast carcinoma o
f varying histologic types and nuclear grades was analyzed by flaw cyt
ometry and image analysis in both fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-e
mbedded tissue, Fresh cell and deparaffinized nuclear suspensions were
used for flow cytometry, Fresh and deparaffinized tumor tissue sample
s were used for image analysis, The results of analysis for DNA ploidy
, DNA index of DNA aneuploid G(0)/G(1) peaks, and S-phase fraction wer
e compared in different tissue preparations for both techniques, The t
wo techniques produced comparable DNA ploidy results with both fresh a
nd formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Sensitivity for detection
of DNA aneuploidy was somewhat greater by image analysis, particularl
y in deparaffinized tissue, There was 89% agreement in detection of RN
A aneuploidy by flow cytometry in fresh and paraffin-embedded, formali
n-fixed tissue; the coefficients of variation of the DNA diploid G(0)/
G(1) peaks were much wider in the latter, In image analysis there was
98% agreement between fresh and fixed specimens, Agreement between the
flow cytometry and image analysis in fresh specimens was 91%; in depa
raffinized nuclear suspensions it was 94%, There is a high degree of c
orrelation between the values of DNA index of DNA aneuploid G(0)/G(1)
peaks; the estimates of S-phase fraction are much more variable, Resul
ts also show a good correlation of the DNA ploidy with the nuclear gra
des, Results reconfirm that preferential loss of specific cell populat
ions during processing together with sampling error and/or dilutional
effect of normal cells present in cell suspensions should be considere
d in interpreting the results of flow cytometry and that sensitivity o
f image analysis for detection of near diploid DNA peaks is limited, W
e conclude that for detection of DNA aneuploid cell populations, a com
bination of both techniques is superior to either of them alone. (C) 1
995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.