COMPARISON OF 5-PERCENT WITH DEXTROSE, 1.5-PERCENT WITH DEXTROSE, AND1.5-PERCENT DEXTROSE-FREE LIDOCAINE SOLUTIONS FOR SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS
S. Liu et al., COMPARISON OF 5-PERCENT WITH DEXTROSE, 1.5-PERCENT WITH DEXTROSE, AND1.5-PERCENT DEXTROSE-FREE LIDOCAINE SOLUTIONS FOR SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 81(4), 1995, pp. 697-702
The use of lidocaine in concentrations less than 5% for spinal anesthe
sia may be advantageous but has not been carefully studied. Lidocaine
50 mg (1.5% with dextrose and 1.5% dextrose-free) was administered to
eight volunteers in a randomized, double blind, cross-over fashion. Al
l of these subjects had previously received 5% lidocaine with dextrose
using the same experimental protocol. Sensory analgesia was assessed
with pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent
to surgical incision, and duration of tolerance of pneumatic thigh tou
rniquet. Motor block was assessed with isometric force dynamometry. Pe
ak dermatomal level was the highest and duration until regression of p
inprick the longest with the 5% solution (P < 0.05). Duration of toler
ance to TES was increased (33 +/- 10 min) with the 5% solution (P < 0.
04). Duration of tolerance to tourniquet pain was increased (11 +/- 3
min) with the 5% solution (P < 0.02). Duration of motor block was incr
eased (45 +/- 9 min) with the 5% and the 1.5% without dextrose solutio
ns (P < 0.04). Time to void was increased (33 +/- 5 min) with the 5% s
olution (P < 0.03). In conclusion, the use of different solutions of l
idocaine for spinal anesthesia results in significant differences in s
ensory and motor block and time until recovery of micturition.