Hph. Neumann et al., CONSEQUENCES OF DIRECT GENETIC TESTING FOR GERMLINE MUTATIONS IN THE CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF FAMILIES WITH MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA, TYPE-II, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(14), 1995, pp. 1149-1151
Objective.-Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type II (MEN-II) is an autoso
mal dominant disorder characterized by tumors of thyroid C cells and p
heochromocytoma. Recently, germline mutations in the RET proto-oncogen
e have been identified in patients with MEN-II. The aims of this study
were (1) to define the mutations in clinically diagnosed MEN-II famil
ies, (2) to compare the results of genetic and biochemical testing, an
d (3) to evaluate the impact of mutation analyses for the members of t
hese families. Design.-Register-based survey study of clinically affec
ted and unaffected members of MEN-II families. Setting.-Register of fa
milies from Germany and Spain with pheochromocytomas. Two research lab
oratories at Cambridge University in the United Kingdom. Patients.-We
investigated consenting affected and unaffected members belonging to a
series of 10 families who met the clinical criteria for MEN-II. Main
Outcome Measures.-(1) Presence or absence of germline mutation in the
RET proto-oncogene in affected and unaffected members of the 10 famili
es, and (2) in the absence of RET mutation in a given family, presence
or absence of germline mutation in the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene,
which is the susceptibility gene involved in a closely related syndrom
e, von Hippel-Lindau disease. Results.-In eight of these families, RET
mutations were identified. The specific mutations were detected in al
l affected members. The remaining two families without RET mutations w
ere subsequently shown to have a mutation within the VHL gene. The VHL
mutations were identified in both families and represent a previously
undescribed base change, After identification of the mutation, premor
bid genetic testing was performed in all MEN-II and VHL families, resu
lting in detection of asymptomatic carriers in the MEN-II families. Cl
inically, the two VHL families differed from the eight MEN-II families
by the presence of a C-cell tumor in only one individual from each fa
mily and extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma in three of nine affected indi
viduals in the two families combined. Conclusions.-The diagnosis of ME
N-II should be confirmed by molecular genetic analysis and the diagnos
is of VHL syndrome should be considered for families with an absence o
f RET mutations and a preponderance of pheochromocytomas.