Bl. Lucht et Db. Collum, ETHEREAL SOLVATION OF LITHIUM HEXAMETHYLDISILAZIDE - UNEXPECTED RELATIONSHIPS OF SOLVATION NUMBER, SOLVATION ENERGY, AND AGGREGATION STATE, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 117(39), 1995, pp. 9863-9874
Li-6, N-15, and C-13 NMR spectroscopic studies of Li-6-N-15 labeled li
thium hexamethyldisilazide ([Li-6, N-15]-LiHMDS) are reported. Mono-,
di-, and mixed-solvated dimers are characterized in the limit of slow
solvent exchange for a variety of ethereal ligands including the follo
wing: tetrahydrofuran (THF), 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF), 2,2-di
methyltetrahydrofuran (2,2-Me(2)THF), diethyl ether (Et(2)O), tert-but
yl methyl ether (t-BuOMe), n-butyl methyl ether (n-BuOMe), tetrahydrop
yran (THP), methyl isopropyl ether (i-PrOMe), and trimethylene oxide (
oxetane). The ligand exchange is too fast to observe bound and free di
isopropyl ether (i-Pr2O), tert-amyl methyl ether (Me(2)(Et)COMe), and
2,2,5,5-tetramethyltetrahydrofuran (2,2,5,5-Me(4)THF). Exclusively dis
sociative ligand substitutions occur at low ligand concentrations for
all ligands except oxetane. Relative free energies and enthalpies of L
iHMDS dimer solvation determined for eight ethereal ligands show an ap
proximate inverse correlation of binding energy and ligand steric dema
nd. Mixed solvation is found to be non-cooperative showing there exist
s little communication between the two lithium sites on the dimer. The
different ethereal solvents display a widely varying propensity to ca
use formation of LiHMDS monomer. The often-cited correlation of reduce
d aggregation state with increasing strength of the lithium-solvent in
teraction receives no support whatsoever. The measured free energies o
f aggregation display a considerable solvent dependence that is traced
to solvent-independent enthalpies of aggregation and solvent-dependen
t entropies of aggregation. LiHMDS monomer solvation numbers derive fr
om solvent-concentration-dependent monomer:dimer proportions. Moderate
ly hindered ethereal solvents afford LiHMDS monomers in trisolvated fo
rms ((Me(3)Si)(2)NLiS3) whereas THF and oxetane appear to afford consi
derable concentrations of five-coordinate tetrasolvates ((Me(3)Si)(2)N
LiS4). The complex relationship between solvation energy and observabl
e aggregation state is discussed in light of solvent-amide and solvent
-solvent interactions on both the monomer and the dimer, the combined
contributions of solvation enthalpy and entropy, and the complicating
intervention of variable solvation numbers.