C. Gillis et al., ULTRASONOGRAPHY AS A METHOD TO DETERMINE TENDON CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA, American journal of veterinary research, 56(10), 1995, pp. 1270-1274
Ultrasonographic cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements of equine sup
erficial digital flexor (SDF) tendon were obtained to determine the fe
asibility of ultrasonography for CSA measurement of tendon in vivo and
in vitro. Ultrasonographic measurements were compared with a more tra
ditional CSA measurement method, ink-blot analysis. In addition, value
s for ultrasonographic SDF tendon mean echogenicity were obtained in v
ivo and in vitro. The left forelimb SDF tendons of 23 horses were eval
uated ultrasonographically. Cross-sectional images were acquired at 4-
cm intervals distal to the base of the accessory carpal bone (DACB) to
the level of the proximal sesamoid bones while horses were standing s
quarely. After euthanasia, the left forelimbs were mounted in a materi
als testing system (MTS) and loaded under tension to standing load. Ul
trasonographic images were again acquired at the same locations. The u
ltrasonographic images were digitized, and values for ultrasonographic
CSA and mean echogenicity were obtained for each level. Immediately a
fter mechanical testing, a 1-cm-thick transverse section of SDF tendon
at 12 cm DACB was removed. Three ink blots were prepared from each en
d of the removed tendon section and digitized. The 6 CSA values were a
veraged to generate a value for morphologic CSA for each DF tendon at
12 cm DACB. Standing ultrasonographic tendon CSA at 12 cm DACB was con
sistently smallest (mean +/- SD CSA = 86 +/- 11 mm(2)), followed by MT
S ultrasonographic CSA (mean, 95 +/- 12 mm(2)), with ink-blot morpholo
gic CSA being largest (mean, 99 +/- 15 mm(2)). Comparison of standing
and MTS ultrasonographic CSA values at 12 cm DACB revealed a strong po
sitive linear correlation between methods (R(2) = 0.74, P = 0.001). Co
mparison of ink-blot CSA at 12 cm DACB with standing and MTS ultrasono
graphic CSA revealed strong positive linear correlations (R(2) = 0.64,
P = 0.001 and R(2) = 0.72, P = 0.001, respectively). For ultrasonogra
phic mean echogenicity, standing values insignificantly exceeded MTS v
alues at each level. The authors conclude that ultrasonography is a us
eful technique for the noninvasive assessment of SDF tendon CSA that c
an be applied in vivo and in vitro.