COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE BIOAVAILABILITY OF BETA-AESCINE AFTER SINGLEORAL-ADMINISTRATION OF 2 DIFFERENT DRUG FORMULATIONS CONTAINING AN EXTRACT OF HORSE-CHESTNUT SEEDS
E. Schrader et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE BIOAVAILABILITY OF BETA-AESCINE AFTER SINGLEORAL-ADMINISTRATION OF 2 DIFFERENT DRUG FORMULATIONS CONTAINING AN EXTRACT OF HORSE-CHESTNUT SEEDS, Die Pharmazie, 50(9), 1995, pp. 623-627
The relative oral bioavailability of beta-escine (CAS 11072-93-8) from
a sugar-coated tablet formulation was compared to a reference prepara
tion available in capsule form in 18 healthy, male volunteers over a 4
8 h period. The study design was randomized, single-blind and cross-ov
er. Both the test and the reference preparation contained 50 mg standa
rdized horse chestnut seed extract; beta-escine was taken as the refer
ence substance. By means of a newly developed, validated radioimmunoso
rbent assay (RIA), beta-escine in plasma was determined (blind samples
) after oral intake of a single dose of each drug formulation. The con
fidence limits calculated for the AUC, C-max and T-max of the test pre
paration exceed the upper limit of the specified equivalence range of
80%-125%, but do never fall below the lower limit. Therefore, bioin-eq
uivalence cannot be rejected statistically. All the bioavailibility da
ta for the test preparation - measured with the newly developed RIA -
exceed the corresponding values for the reference preparation. As the
rate of absorption of aesculetinic triterpene glycosides is low, the h
igher bioavailability of the test preparation is desirable from a ther
apeutical point of view. Since the reference preparation is classified
as being clinically effective, the test preparation must also be esti
mated as being clinically effective. Adverse drug effects were not obs
erved with either the test preparation or the reference preparation.