We examine how up-or-out rules operate as a screening device in the ma
rket for lawyers. Using data on large New York law firms, we show that
firm growth is a slow and uncertain process because performance as an
associate is not an especially informative signal about whether a law
yer will make a good partner and because the costs of mistaken promoti
on are relatively high. A newly hired associate is unlikely to be a su
itable partner and the screening process is relatively imprecise. Firm
growth therefore contributes between 5%-7% of the present value of pr
ofits of a law firm.