A. Berchuck et al., POSTSURGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF PATIENTS WITH FIGO STAGE I II ENDOMETRIAL ADENOCARCINOMA/, Gynecologic oncology, 59(1), 1995, pp. 20-24
Objective: To examine the effect of postsurgical surveillance on survi
val of patients with FIGO stage I/II endometrial adenocaricinoma. Meth
ods: We examined the records of 354 patients who underwent primary sur
gical therapy for FIGO stage I/II endometrial adenocarcinoma. In patie
nts who developed recurrent disease, we determined whether symptoms or
signs of disease were present at recurrence and whether there was evi
dence of disease on Pap smear or chest radiograph. Results: Among the
354 patients in this study, 44 (12%) developed recurrent disease. Site
s of recurrence included 12 (27%) isolated vaginal, 12 (27%) pelvis wi
th vagina or abdomen, 4 (10%) isolated lung, 13 (29%) pelvic/abdominal
with other distant sites, and 3 (7%) other distant sites. At diagnosi
s of recurrence 61% of patients had symptoms related to their cancer,
68% had physical exam findings suggestive of recurrence, and 84% had s
ymptoms and/or signs. Findings consistent with recurrent cancer were d
etected by Pap smear in 25% and on chest radiograph in 20%. Among the
44 patients who developed recurrent disease, 8 (18%) remain alive with
out evidence of disease, including 6/12 (50%) with isolated vaginal di
sease and 2/34 (6%) with other patterns of recurrent disease (P = 0.01
). Among the 12 patients with isolated vaginal recurrence, 1/3 (33%) i
n whom recurrent disease was diagnosed by Pap smear alone was salvaged
compared to 5/9 (56%) who had symptoms or signs of vaginal recurrence
. None of the three patients in whom an abnormal chest radiograph was
the only evidence of recurrence survived. Conclusions: Because of the
low recurrence rate of FIGO stage I/II endometrial cancer and the pauc
ity of effective second-line treatment, surveillance Pap smears and ch
est radiographs appear to have little impact on survival. Although few
asymptomatic potentially curable recurrences were detected due to sur
veillance examinations, the value of psychological reassurance associa
ted with a normal examination is difficult to quantitate. (C) 1995 Aca
demic Press, Inc.