AUTOLOGOUS BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION VERSUS CHEMOTHERAPY IN RELAPSED REFRACTORY NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA - ESTIMATES OF LONG-TERM SURVIVAL FROM THE RECENT LITERATURE
Kr. Meehan et al., AUTOLOGOUS BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION VERSUS CHEMOTHERAPY IN RELAPSED REFRACTORY NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA - ESTIMATES OF LONG-TERM SURVIVAL FROM THE RECENT LITERATURE, American journal of hematology, 50(2), 1995, pp. 116-123
Long-term survival following chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow tr
ansplantation in adults with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphom
a was evaluated. English language articles published from January 1, 1
988 to September 1, 1993 were obtained from a broad-based MEDLINE sear
ch retrieving 3,854 citations regarding therapy for lymphomas. Citatio
ns were evaluated using both computer-based evaluation and manual revi
ew, Articles were included if they addressed the disease of interest (
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Working Formulation D-H), the population of in
terest (adults with either relapsed or refractory disease), and the th
erapies of interest (chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplant
ation). Articles were excluded if they did not provide convincing info
rmation on long-term survival (as evidenced by either survival analysi
s or individual patient data) or if they reported a small number of pa
tients (N < 15). No randomized trials of the two therapies were found.
Nine case series were found reporting on 444 eligible patients receiv
ing chemotherapy; eight were found reporting on 256 patients undergoin
g autologous marrow transplantation. After weighting by sample size, t
he mean 3-year survival rate was 25% (95% CI, 23-30%) following chemot
herapy and 40% (95% CI, 33-47%) following marrow transplantation. The
reporting of potentially relevant prognostic factors was inconsistent
among articles. Despite our comprehensive synthesis and evaluation of
currently available data, the survival advantage of marrow transplanta
tion in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that we report must
be viewed as tentative, given the limitations of the case series data
. In addition, establishing the comparability of patients treated with
these therapies is made more difficult by the inconsistent reporting
of potentially relevant prognostic factors. The results of an internat
ional randomized trial of these two therapies is forthcoming and may a
ddress some of these shortcomings. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.