APPLICATION OF THE FAST-EVAPORATION SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD FOR IMPROVING QUANTIFICATION OF ANGIOTENSIN-II BY MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER-DESORPTION IONIZATION
Aj. Nicola et al., APPLICATION OF THE FAST-EVAPORATION SAMPLE PREPARATION METHOD FOR IMPROVING QUANTIFICATION OF ANGIOTENSIN-II BY MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER-DESORPTION IONIZATION, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 9(12), 1995, pp. 1164-1171
The fast-evaporation method of sample preparation has been applied for
quantitative analysis using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionizati
on (MALDI) mass spectrometry. An instrumental protocol focusing on imp
rovement of shot-to-shot repeatability and compensation for signal deg
radation has been developed for quantification of angiotensin II using
the fast-evaporation technique and an internal standard. The fast-eva
poration method was compared to the standard method of sample preparat
ion (using a multicomponent matrix) in the quantitative analysis of an
giotensin II, and found to be superior in several respects, Improvemen
t In sample homogeneity using the Past-evaporation method enhanced bot
h point-to-point repeatibility and sample-to-sample reproducibility. T
he relative standard deviations of the analyte/internal standard ratio
s (point RSD) were decreased by a factor of three compared to those ob
tained using the multicomponent matrix method, The average point RSD w
as found to be ca. 5% for the fast-evaporation technique. Two internal
standards were evaluated for quantification of angiotensin II. The be
tter one, 1-SAR-8-Ile angiotensin II, yielded a relative standard devi
ation of the standard curve slope of ca. 2.2% over two orders of magni
tude of concentration (45 nM to 3000 nM), an improvement by a factor o
f two over the standard preparation method. Renal microdialysate sampl
es, spiked with angiotensin II and the internal standard 1-SAR-8-Ile a
ngiotensin II, were also analyzed using the fast-evaporation technique
. The detection limit was calculated to be in the high attomole range
(675 amol). Furthermore, the accuracy for a single determination of an
giotensin II concentration in these samples was found to be 13.9% with
a relative error of 8.19%.