ASSESSMENT OF THE SKELETAL STATUS BY PERIPHERAL QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE FOREARM - SHORT-TERM PRECISION IN-VIVO AND COMPARISON TO DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
S. Grampp et al., ASSESSMENT OF THE SKELETAL STATUS BY PERIPHERAL QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE FOREARM - SHORT-TERM PRECISION IN-VIVO AND COMPARISON TO DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY, Journal of bone and mineral research, 10(10), 1995, pp. 1566-1576
In order to assess precision of peripheral quantitative computed tomog
raphy (pQCT), duplicate bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the
radius were performed in 20 healthy premenopausal, 20 healthy postmen
opausal, and 20 osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a Stratec XCT-
960 system. The short-term reproducibility in vivo for the total, trab
ecular, and cortical regions of interest (ROI) was expressed as the ab
solute precision error (standard deviation, SD) and as the relative pr
ecision error (SD/mean x 100, or coefficient of variation, CV,in %). R
eproducibility in vivo was good in all volunteers but was influenced b
y the study group and the ROI. The precision error for trabecular BMD
was 3 mg/cm(3), or about 1.6%. This is large relative to the aging dec
rease of 0.22%/year, or to the difference (12 mg/cm(3) or 7%) between
osteoporotic women and postmenopausal controls. In order to compare pQ
CT to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm and at the lumbar
spine (L1-L4), 40 premenopausal healthy controls, 40 postmenopausal h
ealthy controls, and 35 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were assesse
d. DXA measurements performed at the ultradistal, middistal, 1/3, and
total ROI of the radius showed only moderate correlations between r =
0.38-0.75, r = 0.27-0.64, and r = 0.38-0.53 for the comparison versus
pQCT total BMD, versus pQCT trabecular BMD, and versus pQCT cortical B
MD, respectively. Correlations of DXA at the lumbar spine and pQCT wer
e between r = 0.18 and 0.44. DXA at radius and spine was able to discr
iminate between postmenopausal controls and osteoporotic women (p = 0.
001-0.004), but BMD measurements by pQCT did not show this ability (p
= 0.15-0.52). However, two nonstandard pQCT parameters, namely the sur
face area of the cortical bone and the cortical BMC were factors that
discriminated well between these two groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, res
pectively). These pQCT parameters also yielded the highest relative an
nual changes in pre- and postmenopausal control subjects. The measurem
ent of cortical bone in the distal radius proved to be a good predicto
r of vertebral fracture status and was a good indicator of age-related
skeletal change. Our data emphasize the importance of cortical measur
ements when using pQCT of the radius to assess osteoporosis.