Jj. Osullivan et al., DIGOXIN OR FLECAINIDE FOR PROPHYLAXIS OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIAIN INFANTS, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 26(4), 1995, pp. 991-994
Objectives. This study compared the safety and efficacy of digoxin and
flecainide in the prophylaxis of supraventricular tachycardia in infa
nts. Background. Recurrence of supraventricular tachycardia in infants
is common, Digoxin is the conventional drug of first choice for proph
ylaxis, but its efficacy has not been tested in a controlled clinical
trial, and there is no consensus on the drug of choice when digoxin is
ineffective. Methods. We reviewed retrospectively the records of all
infants with supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular (AV)
reentry admitted to our hospital between January 1986 and December 19
93. Results. Thirty-nine infants presented crith sustained AV reentran
t tachycardia at age 1 to 330 days (median 12). Intravenous flecainide
,vas required to maintain immediate control in six patients who were t
hen treated with oral flecainide. The other 33 patients were treated w
ith oral digoxin, There was no recurrence of tachycardia in 14 (42%) o
f the 33 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 25% to 61%). In the ot
her 19 patients (58%) (95% CI 39% to 75%), digoxin was replaced by ora
l flecainide because of multiple recurrence of tachycardia, Full contr
ol was achieved in all 19 of these patients (100%) (95% CI 82% to 100%
) and in 5 of the 6 patients treated with both intravenous and oral fl
ecainide. Thus, overall, flecainide was effective in 24 (96%) of 25 pa
tients (95% CI 80% to 100%). Conclusions. Comparison with previous nat
ural history studies suggests that digoxin is ineffective in the proph
ylaxis of supraventricular tachycardia. Oral flecainide was effective
in a small number of infants, with no adverse effects (95% CI 0% to 12
%), and may now be preferred as the primary prophylactic agent.